Re: replication only

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Bill Moran wrote:

> In response to Jef Peeraer <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be>:
> >
> > i read about the replication possibilities with postgresql. If i just need
> > some replication ( without failover stuff ) to 1 standby server, what
> > would be the best option to go with.
>
> Your description of you requirements is very lacking, so much so that
> any attempt at suggesting a "best" option would be pointless.
>
> Provide some more information on your requirements and people will be
> able to answer intelligently.
my apology, i tried to be brief.
i've got a main database, where all transactions end up. Daily we make a
backup (pg_dumpall) and restore the first database in a sort of backup
database. This backup database is mainly used to do reporting.
To automate this process for the backup database and to minimize the
out-of-sync state, i should like to use replication.
The second backup database is only used as read-only,
except for some third party software that writes to 1 table.

jef peeraer

>
> --
> Bill Moran
> Collaborative Fusion Inc.
> http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
>
> wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com
> Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>