| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jef Peeraer <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: replication only |
| Date: | 2008-08-05 12:18:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20080805081831.7cadfb6d.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to Jef Peeraer <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be>:
>
> i read about the replication possibilities with postgresql. If i just need
> some replication ( without failover stuff ) to 1 standby server, what
> would be the best option to go with.
Your description of you requirements is very lacking, so much so that
any attempt at suggesting a "best" option would be pointless.
Provide some more information on your requirements and people will be
able to answer intelligently.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jef Peeraer | 2008-08-05 13:17:19 | Re: replication only |
| Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2008-08-05 11:35:05 | Re: is a 'pairwise' possible / feasible in SQL? |