From: | Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
Date: | 2008-06-25 13:03:58 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0806251355090.4085@aragorn.flymine.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> Has anyone done some benchmarks between hardware RAID vs Linux MD software
>> RAID?
>
> I have here:
> http://merlinmoncure.blogspot.com/2007/08/following-are-results-of-our-testing-of.html
>
> The upshot is I don't really see a difference in performance.
The main difference is that you can get hardware RAID with
battery-backed-up cache, which means small writes will be much quicker
than software RAID. Postgres does a lot of small writes under some use
cases.
Without a BBU cache, it is sensible to put the transaction logs on a
separate disc system to the main database, to make the transaction log
writes fast (due to no seeking on those discs). However, with a BBU cache,
that advantage is irrelevant, as the cache will absorb the writes.
However, not all hardware RAID will have such a battery-backed-up cache,
and those that do tend to have a hefty price tag.
Matthew
--
$ rm core
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter T. Breuer | 2008-06-25 13:11:23 | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-06-25 12:52:21 | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |