Re: Hardware vs Software RAID

From: "Peter T(dot) Breuer" <ptb(at)inv(dot)it(dot)uc3m(dot)es>
To: "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
Date: 2008-06-25 13:11:23
Message-ID: 200806251311.m5PDBNv23559@inv.it.uc3m.es
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Also sprach Matthew Wakeling:"
> >> Has anyone done some benchmarks between hardware RAID vs Linux MD software
> >> RAID?
...
> > The upshot is I don't really see a difference in performance.
>
> The main difference is that you can get hardware RAID with
> battery-backed-up cache, which means small writes will be much quicker
> than software RAID. Postgres does a lot of small writes under some use

It doesn't "mean" that, I'm afraid. You can put the log/bitmap wherever
you want in software raid, including on a battery-backed local ram disk
if you feel so inclined. So there is no intrinsic advantage to be
gained there at all.

> However, not all hardware RAID will have such a battery-backed-up cache,
> and those that do tend to have a hefty price tag.

Whereas software raid and a firewire-attached log device does not.

Peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-06-25 13:50:39 Re: Postgresql update op is very very slow
Previous Message Matthew Wakeling 2008-06-25 13:03:58 Re: Hardware vs Software RAID