From: | "Peter T(dot) Breuer" <ptb(at)inv(dot)it(dot)uc3m(dot)es> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
Date: | 2008-06-25 13:11:23 |
Message-ID: | 200806251311.m5PDBNv23559@inv.it.uc3m.es |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Also sprach Matthew Wakeling:"
> >> Has anyone done some benchmarks between hardware RAID vs Linux MD software
> >> RAID?
...
> > The upshot is I don't really see a difference in performance.
>
> The main difference is that you can get hardware RAID with
> battery-backed-up cache, which means small writes will be much quicker
> than software RAID. Postgres does a lot of small writes under some use
It doesn't "mean" that, I'm afraid. You can put the log/bitmap wherever
you want in software raid, including on a battery-backed local ram disk
if you feel so inclined. So there is no intrinsic advantage to be
gained there at all.
> However, not all hardware RAID will have such a battery-backed-up cache,
> and those that do tend to have a hefty price tag.
Whereas software raid and a firewire-attached log device does not.
Peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-06-25 13:50:39 | Re: Postgresql update op is very very slow |
Previous Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2008-06-25 13:03:58 | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |