| From: | gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net |
|---|---|
| To: | "Wm(dot)A(dot)Stafford" <stafford(at)marine(dot)rutgers(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier |
| Date: | 2006-11-20 20:24:13 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0611201523080.7578@mx1.linuxlouis.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Are you talking about a SQL statement qualifier, where you may be
referring to "distinct"
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
> I hope the subject says it all. I'm porting an Oracle-centric application to
> PostgreSQL and the Oracle sql is full of the 'unique' qualifier. I'm
> assuming PostgreSQL does not support 'unique' since don't see a 'unique'
> anywhere in the PostgreSQL docs. Is there a substitute or a technique to get
> the same result?
>
> Thanks,
> -=bill stafford
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Louis Gonzales
louis(dot)gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net
http://www.linuxlouis.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wm.A.Stafford | 2006-11-20 20:27:39 | More on unique vs distinct |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2006-11-20 20:24:03 | Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier |