| From: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Riccardo Inverni <riccardo(dot)inverni(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
| Date: | 2006-05-30 21:54:39 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0605301451590.25776@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
How much money do you want to spend? If you don't care, SAN is probably the way
to go.
How much data do you have to store? If you can afford to fit it onto scsi, scsi
probably is still the way to go.
Otherwise, sata arrays have come a long way in 3 years, and they are by FAR the
cheapest solution out there. Do some research and see if they're good enough for
you.
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Riccardo Inverni wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have to update a Linux box with PostgreSQL on it, essentially for data
> warehousing purposes. I had set it up about 3 years ago and at that time the
> best solution I had been recommended was to use SCSI disks with hardware
> RAID controllers.
>
> Is this still the way to go or things have recently changed? Any other
> suggestion/advice? What about SAN?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
> Riccardo
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-30 22:22:08 | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
| Previous Message | Alex Turner | 2006-05-30 21:46:48 | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |