From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | Riccardo Inverni <riccardo(dot)inverni(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
Date: | 2006-05-30 22:22:08 |
Message-ID: | 447CC590.4070305@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:28, Riccardo Inverni wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have to update a Linux box with PostgreSQL on it, essentially for
>> data warehousing purposes. I had set it up about 3 years ago and at
>> that time the best solution I had been recommended was to use SCSI
>> disks with hardware RAID controllers.
>>
>> Is this still the way to go or things have recently changed? Any
>> other suggestion/advice? What about SAN?
>
> Actually, modern SATA server drives are now considered competitive with
> the proper RAID controller.
And for a DW application they are the most megabyte per dollar you can by.
>
> Nowadays most people seem to recommend the Areca controllers. I haven't
> used them myself, but would be happy to test them some day.
I have heard good things about the Areca, but I have never used them. I
have had excellent luck with the LSI controllers however.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Broussard | 2006-05-31 01:07:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Schema Limitations ? |
Previous Message | Ben | 2006-05-30 21:54:39 | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |