Re: [HACKERS] IS OF

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
Date: 2003-08-08 07:48:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.56.0308080947460.1385@krusty.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Joe Conway writes:

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Can someone suggest where to document IS OF, and either document it's
> > non-standard behavior or supply patch?
> >

I suggest I should not be documented until it's fixed.

> Doc patch attached for IS OF. Please apply.

That is not the right place for it. IS OF is an operator, not an SQL
command.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-08 07:54:58 Re: threads/UnixWare
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-08 07:46:32 Re: Moved simple_prompt()/sprompt.c

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-08 11:02:34 Re: libpg sv.po
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-08-08 05:29:07 Re: [HACKERS] IS OF