Re: [HACKERS] IS OF

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
Date: 2003-08-08 21:37:59
Message-ID: 3F341837.70203@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I suggest I should not be documented until it's fixed.
>
>>Doc patch attached for IS OF. Please apply.
>
> That is not the right place for it. IS OF is an operator, not an SQL
> command.
>

OK. If the attached patch is acceptable/applied, I'll fix and resend the
doc patch.

Joe

Attachment Content-Type Size
isof-null-fix.2.patch text/plain 3.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-08-08 21:49:27 Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-08 21:34:32 pgindent run

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-08-08 21:49:27 Re: [HACKERS] IS OF
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2003-08-08 21:36:47 Translation to Brazilian Portuguese