From: | Yury Bokhoncovich <byg(at)center-f1(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... |
Date: | 2002-10-02 07:33:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0210021431310.17945-100000@panda.center-f1.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello!
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It is not clear to me; is this its own transaction or a function call?
BTW.
As reported by my friend:
Oracle 8.1.7 (ver.9 behaves the same way):
--- cut ---
SQL> SET TRANSACTION READ WRITE;
Transaction set.
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') FROM DUAL;
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM
-------------------
02-10-2002 10:04:19
SQL> -- wait a lot
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') FROM DUAL;
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM
-------------------
02-10-2002 10:04:27
SQL> COMMIT;
Commit complete.
--- cut ---
> > > > > Any Oracle 9 users out there?
> > > > >
> > > > > I need this run:
> > > > >
> > > > > BEGIN;
> > > > > SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
> > > > > -- wait 5 seconds
> > > > > SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
> > > > >
> > > > > Are those two timestamps the same?
--
WBR, Yury Bokhoncovich, Senior System Administrator, NOC of F1 Group.
Phone: +7 (3832) 106228, ext.140, E-mail: byg(at)center-f1(dot)ru(dot)
Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2002-10-02 07:37:04 | Re: Improving speed of copy |
Previous Message | Alexey Borzov | 2002-10-02 07:31:41 | concerning rserv Re[2]: PostgreSQL Website : advocacy.postgresql.org |