Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Yury Bokhoncovich <byg(at)center-f1(dot)ru>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Roland Roberts <roland(at)astrofoto(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
Date: 2002-10-02 13:17:19
Message-ID: 22093.1033564639@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yury Bokhoncovich <byg(at)center-f1(dot)ru> writes:
> As reported by my friend:
> Oracle 8.1.7 (ver.9 behaves the same way):
> [ to_char(sysdate) advances in a transaction ]

Now I'm really confused; this directly contradicts the report of Oracle
8's behavior that we had earlier from Roland Roberts. Can someone
explain why the different results?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-02 13:29:49 Re: Purpose of rscale/dscale in NUMERIC?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-02 13:13:08 Re: Fwd: int type problem in 7.3