From: | "Serguei A(dot) Mokhov" <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, LELARGE Guillaume <gleu(at)wanadoo(dot)fr> |
Subject: | Re: Missing French backend translations in the HEAD |
Date: | 2004-08-10 22:01:52 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0408101747520.12594-100000@haida.cs.concordia.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:51:52 +0200
>
> Serguei A. Mokhov wrote:
> > backend/po/fr.po had 99% translations done for 7.4, and nos it is
> > totally missing for the current CVS tip (it is in the
> > Attic)....mmmm... why? Most of those messasge are still applicable to
> > the current, no? Commit message from you from 2 weeks ago says:
>
> The file has only ever existed in the 7.4 branch, because it was
> submitted as postgres-7.4.po.bz2.
So? It is still valid in most part for 8.0. The parts that are not, won't
do any bad.
> I think the log messages are a CVS artifact. If Guillaume wants, I can
> also put the 7.4 PO file in the head branch.
I was surpirsed not finding it there, actually, when everything else is
there. I need sometimes the French localized messages, that's why I
brought it up.
Guillaume?
(BTW, does a fr_CA version of it have a chance of being accepted? French
here (in Canada) is still a bit different with its own specifics.
Spelling-wise, the most notable difference is having CAPS with accents
where fr_FR normally doesn't have (for corresponding lowercase accented
letters) and spacing. Maybe a bit of terminology as well, but I don't have
an example handy). Of course, you can start making an argument of then
should we create en_BR, pt, es_MX, etc, but.. any comment?).
--
Serguei A. Mokhov | /~\ The ASCII
Computer Science Department | \ / Ribbon Campaign
Concordia University | X Against HTML
Montreal, Quebec, Canada | / \ Email!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-10 22:46:43 | Re: Why is WIN 1250 client only? |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-08-10 21:31:45 | Re: ErrorContextCallback |