Re: First two requests for PUGs

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ben Abdallah Abdel Karim <karim2k(at)mail(dot)be>, Robby Russell <robbyrussell(at)pdxlug(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First two requests for PUGs
Date: 2004-04-29 20:39:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0404292338240.20878-100000@emo.org.tr
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


Hi Marc,

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> > I'd go for that.
>
> k, so .. ? :)
>
> first off, should we change sfpug to pug-sf, with an alias from
> sfpug->pug-sf, so that it falls under the convention?

Ok, god.

> second, pug-? for the two new lists?

How about these?

pug-pdx(at)postgresql(dot)org
pug-tunesia(at)postgresql(dot)org

Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-29 20:39:30 Re: First two requests for PUGs
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-04-29 20:35:15 Re: First two requests for PUGs