Re: First two requests for PUGs

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ben Abdallah Abdel Karim <karim2k(at)mail(dot)be>, Robby Russell <robbyrussell(at)pdxlug(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First two requests for PUGs
Date: 2004-04-29 20:35:15
Message-ID: 20040429173420.O45839@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
> > Can we come up with a standard naming convention for PUG lists first?
> > pgsql-* is the PostgreSQL lists, pgadmin-* is for PgAdmin ... maybe pug-*
> > for PUGs?
>
> I'd go for that.

k, so .. ? :)

first off, should we change sfpug to pug-sf, with an alias from
sfpug->pug-sf, so that it falls under the convention?

second, pug-? for the two new lists?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2004-04-29 20:39:11 Re: First two requests for PUGs
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-04-29 20:21:28 Re: Promoting PostgreSQL to the world.