From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ben Abdallah Abdel Karim <karim2k(at)mail(dot)be>, Robby Russell <robbyrussell(at)pdxlug(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: First two requests for PUGs |
Date: | 2004-04-29 20:35:15 |
Message-ID: | 20040429173420.O45839@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Marc,
>
> > Can we come up with a standard naming convention for PUG lists first?
> > pgsql-* is the PostgreSQL lists, pgadmin-* is for PgAdmin ... maybe pug-*
> > for PUGs?
>
> I'd go for that.
k, so .. ? :)
first off, should we change sfpug to pug-sf, with an alias from
sfpug->pug-sf, so that it falls under the convention?
second, pug-? for the two new lists?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-04-29 20:39:11 | Re: First two requests for PUGs |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-04-29 20:21:28 | Re: Promoting PostgreSQL to the world. |