From: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, openfts discussion <openfts-general(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Subject: | Solved: questions about tsearch2 (for czech language) |
Date: | 2003-12-23 08:03:04 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0312230858550.3176-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Oleg
You has true. After restart of postmaster all works fine.
tsearch2=# select to_tsvector('default_czech','Jmenuji se Pavel Stěhule');
to_tsvector
------------------------------------
'pavel':3 'stěhule':4 'jmenovat':1
Thank You very much
Pavel Stehule
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> did you restart psql session after modifying tsearch2 configuration ?
> btw, there is czech dictionary available from http://lingucomponent.openoffice.org/download_dictionary.html
> We have utility to convert myspell dicts to ispell one. It's included
> in 7.5 development. Patch for 7.4 could be downloaded from
> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/tsearch/V2/
>
> Also, historically, we use openfts mailing list for discussion of
> tsearch2.
>
> Oleg
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> > > > result. Why? Have I problem with my configuration?
> > >
> > > did you specify stop words in dictionaries configuration ?
> > >
> > > select * from pg_ts_dict;
> > >
> > tsearch2=# select * from pg_ts_dict where dict_name ='cz_ispell';
> > -[ RECORD 1
> > ]---+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > dict_name | cz_ispell
> > dict_init | 173405
> > dict_initoption |
> > DictFile="/usr/lib/ispell/czech",AffFile="/usr/lib/ispell/czech.aff",StopFile="/usr/local/pgsql/share/contrib/czech.stop"
> > dict_lexize | 173406
> > dict_comment |
> >
> > [postgres(at)usop root]$ cat /usr/local/pgsql/share/contrib/czech.stop|grep -e "^[sv]."
> > se
> > sem
> > si
> > svůj
> > ve
> > vám
> > váš
> > viz
> > vy
> >
> > > >
> > > > 2. I use small czech dictionary. I need don't erase words which aren't in
> > > > dictionary (in my sample Stěhule). Can I set it somewhere? I tryed add
> > > > simple dict into cfg map, but witout sucess
> > > >
> > >
> > > Example, please ! What do you mean 'erase words' ?
> > >
> > >
> > > > tsearch2=# select * from ts_debug('jmenuji se Pavel Stěhule a bydlím ve
> > > > Skalici.'); ts_name | tok_type | description | token |
> > > > dict_name | tsvector
> > > > ---------------+----------+-------------+---------+--------------------+-----------
> > > > default_czech | word | Word | Stěhule | {cz_ispell,simple} |
> > > > default_czech | lword | Latin word | a | {cz_ispell,simple} |
> > > > default_czech | word | Word | bydlím | {cz_ispell,simple} |
> > > > 'bydlet'
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > If tsearch didn't find word in dictionary, then erase this from result.
> > True? My surname, fo example isn't in dictionary, but I wont save this
> > word in result (tsvector).
> >
> > I use
> >
> > tsearch2=# select version();
> > version
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > PostgreSQL 7.4RC2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.3
> > 20030715 (Red Hat Linux 3.3-14)
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Poole | 2003-12-23 08:46:04 | Re: Parser: parse error - please help... |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2003-12-23 07:17:05 | Re: CHECK versus a Table for an enumeration |