From: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Melanie Bergeron <mbergeron_pg(at)globeecom(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CHECK versus a Table for an enumeration |
Date: | 2003-12-23 07:17:05 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0312230812110.2523-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello Melanie
If your set of items will by static and small, then you can use CHECK
constraint. I use it for five, items itemes.
You can write more simple this constraint
...
user_type TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (user_type IN ('Root','Admin','Standard')),
regards
Pavel Stehule
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Melanie Bergeron wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I want to know what's better between these 2 solutions :
>
> CREATE TABLE user (
> ...
> user_type text CHECK(user_type='Root' OR user_type = 'Admin' OR
> user_type = 'Standard'));
>
> or the following :
>
> CREATE TABLE user_type(
> user_type_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
> user_type_desc text);
>
> CREATE TABLE user (
> ...
> user_type_id integer,
> CONSTRAINT user_type_exists FOREIGN KEY (user_type_id) REFERENCES
> user(user_type_id));
>
> I am really confused so I'll wait for your advices.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Melanie
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2003-12-23 08:03:04 | Solved: questions about tsearch2 (for czech language) |
Previous Message | George Gensure | 2003-12-23 07:06:14 | ecpg question |