Re: Making pg_dump cvs friendly

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making pg_dump cvs friendly
Date: 2003-11-30 18:46:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311301944520.11144-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> I will merge the two options into one and update the docs accordingly.

I don't think we need to the short option. -m doesn't make sense. The
documentation belongs in the pg_dump reference page, not backup.sgml. The
help text of the option should be adjusted to look more like the adjacent
texts. References to CVS don't belong into the --help output.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Nedrow 2003-11-30 18:53:58 pg_hba.conf problem
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2003-11-30 18:27:11 Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-30 18:51:25 Re: clock_timestamp() and transaction_timestamp() function
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-30 17:44:48 Re: Making pg_dump cvs friendly