Re: Making pg_dump cvs friendly

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Making pg_dump cvs friendly
Date: 2003-11-30 17:44:48
Message-ID: 200311301744.hAUHim813470@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches


Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

I will merge the two options into one and update the docs accordingly.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> I have created a patch to postgresql 7.3.3 to make pg_dump more CVS
> friendly. Basically, pg_dump numbers all of it's TOC entries. Therefore,
> if you modify or recreate a view that used to be at the beginning, then
> ALL of your tables/indexes/etc get renumbered, which causes a lot of junk
> in your CVS.
>
> Anyway, the patch is at
>
> http://www.eskimo.com/~johnnyb/pgdump-cvs-patch.diff
>
> Comments welcome, but this is my first patch, so please be gentle :)
>
> Jon
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-30 18:03:44 Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments
Previous Message Martin Marques 2003-11-30 14:43:04 Re: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-30 18:46:46 Re: Making pg_dump cvs friendly
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-30 17:42:31 Re: clock_timestamp() and transaction_timestamp() function