From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2003-11-18 06:04:21 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180703150.639-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Matthew T. O'Connor writes:
> Absolutely! In addition, even if you don't consider win32 a platform to
> run production databases on, the win32 port will help developers who
> work from windows boxes, which is the certainly the most widely used
> desktop environment.
At the risk of stating the obvious: Cygwin is your friend in exactly this
case.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2003-11-18 06:11:51 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2003-11-18 05:52:59 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2003-11-18 06:11:51 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-18 06:00:56 | Re: Release cycle length |