Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 06:04:21
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180703150.639-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Matthew T. O'Connor writes:

> Absolutely! In addition, even if you don't consider win32 a platform to
> run production databases on, the win32 port will help developers who
> work from windows boxes, which is the certainly the most widely used
> desktop environment.

At the risk of stating the obvious: Cygwin is your friend in exactly this
case.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Bertheau 2003-11-18 06:11:51 Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-11-18 05:52:59 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Bertheau 2003-11-18 06:11:51 Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 06:00:56 Re: Release cycle length