| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release cycle length |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 06:00:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20031118015845.P731@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> >> 0. As you say, make it known to the public. Have people test their
> >> in-development applications using a beta.
> >
> > and how do you propose we do that? I think this is the hard part
>
> (1) Make the beta more obvious on the website, as we've already
> discussed
>
> (2) Make a freshmeat.net release announcement for _each_ beta, RC, and
> of course the final release (we totally missed this during 7.4).
> There are probably other software release announcement sites we
> could inform.
Damn, I keep forgetting freshmeat.net altogether ... will get that one
during the day tomorrow ...
> (3) Is it worth trying to get some technical press coverage for the
> start of the beta process? I don't mean on PHB-oriented sites like
> ComputerWorld or ZdNet where we need to do the work of getting a
> press release prepared, but OSNews or Slashdot just need a link to
> the release notes and the source tarballs.
I think so ... just a heads up to tell ppl that we are heading into the
final stretch for the next release, and testing would be 'a good thing'
...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-18 06:04:21 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-11-18 05:53:12 | Re: Release cycle length |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | elein | 2003-11-18 06:57:20 | Re: Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-11-18 05:53:12 | Re: Release cycle length |