| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Date: | 2003-11-17 23:31:24 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180027190.639-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus writes:
> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?
As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
have to come up with better reasons. Also note that most major number
changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
the project has moved to a new phase. I don't see any such move
happening.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-17 23:35:13 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-11-17 23:26:36 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-17 23:35:13 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-11-17 23:26:36 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |