Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-17 23:26:36
Message-ID: 87smkminkj.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> It seems certain that the next release, in 6-9 months, will have at
> a minimum the Windows port and ARC, if not Slony-I as well.
>
> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?

It seems a little premature to speculate on what features may or may
not be present in 6 to 9 months time. Why make this decision now, when
we don't even know what will be in the next release, rather than at
the end of the development cycle?

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-17 23:31:24 Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-17 23:10:39 Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-17 23:31:24 Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-17 23:10:39 Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?