| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com |
| Cc: | mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Conservation of OIDs |
| Date: | 2003-11-14 19:05:46 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311142005070.5327-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com writes:
> Follow-up question: Are different ports really necessary?
Yes.
> I currently have the three different databases defined all in the same
> cluster, and differentiated by name, e.g., mydb, mydbqat, and mydbdev.
> If I have the postmaster start these three instances in separate
> clusters, respectively, using three different directories, such as
>
> $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
> $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/qat
> $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/dev
... then the second and third command will fail.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-11-14 19:07:27 | Re: Conservation of OIDs |
| Previous Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2003-11-14 18:49:26 | More Praise! 7.4 |