Re: Conservation of OIDs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com
Cc: mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Conservation of OIDs
Date: 2003-11-14 19:07:27
Message-ID: 20031114190727.GB25386@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:37:50PM -0500, btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com wrote:

> > If you're really concerned, you can initdb separate clusters for QAT
> > and DEV and run three postmasters using three different ports.
>
> Follow-up question: Are different ports really necessary?

No, and it will be probably a waste of shared_buffers too. IMHO you
should keep them under a single postmaster, and forget about the OID
wraparound problem. It won't be a problem for you anyway, because if
you create the whole DB from scratch you won't have OID collision
anyway, even on year 2030 when your OIDs really do wrap around. Maybe by
then we will have 8 bit OIDs anyway, and you will surely initdb way
before that.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Las mujeres son como hondas: mientras más resistencia tienen,
más lejos puedes llegar con ellas" (Jonas Nightingale, Leap of Faith)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lynn.Tilby 2003-11-14 19:15:06 Re: Updated Documentation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-14 19:05:46 Re: Conservation of OIDs