Re: contrib and licensing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib and licensing
Date: 2003-04-02 23:00:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0304030059230.3656-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw writes:

> I'm a little put off by this attitude, are you saying there are no LGPL
> dependencies in PostgreSQL or /contrib?

No, the point is, why put it in contrib when someone who wants to use it
has to download your library anyway. Then you might as well distribute
the module next to that library.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message cbbrowne 2003-04-02 23:01:05 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-04-02 23:00:02 Re: contrib and licensing