From: | mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: contrib and licensing |
Date: | 2003-04-02 22:16:03 |
Message-ID: | 3E8B6123.2020105@mohawksoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>I know nothing in contrib should be GPL, I have no problem with that.
>>The question is the requirement of a GPL library to build a contrib project.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>My SOAP/XML function will probably require my LGPL library as there is a
>>lot of code I have written that I would need to implement it.
>>
>>
>
>If it won't work without your library then there's not much point in
>putting it into contrib. Might as well just put it in your library
>and distribute same as you have been doing.
>
>
I'm a little put off by this attitude, are you saying there are no LGPL
dependencies in PostgreSQL or /contrib?
If that is a real objective, I'm surprised.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-04-02 22:22:05 | Re: contrib and licensing |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-04-02 21:55:56 | Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). |