Re: pg_dump a specific schema

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump a specific schema
Date: 2003-01-12 16:55:24
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301121733460.29178-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Please wait till we resolve the naming of the command-line arguments.

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:45, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > > I'm asking if that's the correct behavior:
> > > > perhaps we should throw an error instead?
> > >
> > > We certainly should throw an error!
> >
> > Ok, I've attached a revised version of the patch that throws an error if
> > the user specifies a non-existent object for "-t" or "-n". I also made a
> > few minor updates and documentation improvements.
> >
> > I'll change the command-line args once we've reached a consensus on what
> > they should be.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Neil
> > --
> > Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
> >
> >
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
>

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-12 16:55:36 Re: pg_dump a specific schema
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-12 15:38:41 Re: minor PL/PgSQL doc improvement