Re: pg_dump a specific schema

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump a specific schema
Date: 2003-01-12 15:38:26
Message-ID: 200301121538.h0CFcQp14492@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:45, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > I'm asking if that's the correct behavior:
> > > perhaps we should throw an error instead?
> >
> > We certainly should throw an error!
>
> Ok, I've attached a revised version of the patch that throws an error if
> the user specifies a non-existent object for "-t" or "-n". I also made a
> few minor updates and documentation improvements.
>
> I'll change the command-line args once we've reached a consensus on what
> they should be.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
> --
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-12 15:38:41 Re: minor PL/PgSQL doc improvement
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-12 01:32:54 Re: fix broken doc build