Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Date: 2002-12-05 23:21:34
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0212060002270.24957-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> It is not real clear to me whether we need a major version bump, rather
> than a minor one. We *do* need to signal binary incompatibility. Who
> can clarify the rules here?

Strictly speaking, it's platform-dependent, but our shared library code
plays a bit of abuse with it. What it comes down to is:

If you change or remove an interface, increment the major version number.
If you add an interface, increment the minor version number. If you did
neither but changed the source code at all, increment the third version
number, if we had one.

To be thoroughly amused, read the libtool source. Grep for 'version_type'.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-12-05 23:37:28 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-12-05 23:21:17 Re: [PATCHES] Patch to make Turks happy.