From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
Date: | 2002-12-10 23:36:04 |
Message-ID: | 200212102336.gBANa4Z25518@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
OK, seeing that we don't have a third number, do people want me to
increment the interface numbers for 7.3.1, or just wait for the
increment in 7.4?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > It is not real clear to me whether we need a major version bump, rather
> > than a minor one. We *do* need to signal binary incompatibility. Who
> > can clarify the rules here?
>
> Strictly speaking, it's platform-dependent, but our shared library code
> plays a bit of abuse with it. What it comes down to is:
>
> If you change or remove an interface, increment the major version number.
> If you add an interface, increment the minor version number. If you did
> neither but changed the source code at all, increment the third version
> number, if we had one.
>
> To be thoroughly amused, read the libtool source. Grep for 'version_type'.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2002-12-10 23:47:24 | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-10 22:28:22 | Re: protocol change in 7.4 |