From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: CREATE CONVERSION |
Date: | 2002-07-08 18:29:56 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0207082028270.1247-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> Tatsuo, it seems that we should use SQL99 terminology and commands where
> appropriate. We do not yet implement the SQL99 forms of character
> support, and I'm not sure if our current system is modeled to fit the
> SQL99 framework. Are you suggesting CREATE CONVERSION to avoid
> infringing on SQL99 syntax to allow us to use that sometime later?
SQL99 says that the method by which conversions are created is
implementation-defined. Tatsuo is defining the implementation.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-08 18:36:04 | Re: DROP COLUMN Progress |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-07-08 18:27:48 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |