Re: DROP COLUMN Progress

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN Progress
Date: 2002-07-08 18:36:04
Message-ID: 200207081836.g68Ia4D13610@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > I am still looking but perhaps you could supress dropped columns from
> > > getting into eref in the first place.
> >
> > OK, that's done. I'm working on not allowing dropped columns in UPDATE
> > targets now.
>
> OK, I've fixed it so that dropped columns cannot be targetted in an update
> statement, however now I'm running into this problem:
>
> If you issue an INSERT statement without qualifying any field names, ie:
>
> INSERT INTO tab VALUES (3);
>
> Although it will automatically insert NULL for the dropped columns, it still
> does cache lookups for the type of the dropped columns, etc. I noticed that
> when I tried setting the atttypid of the dropped column to (Oid)-1. Where
> is the bit of code that figures out the list of columns to insert into in an
> unqualified INSERT statement?

parse_target.c::checkInsertTargets()

>
> I'm thinking that it would be nice if the dropped columns never even make it
> into the list of target attributes, for performance reasons...

Yea, just sloppy to have them there.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-07-08 19:20:46 Re: (A) native Windows port
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-07-08 18:29:56 Re: Proposal: CREATE CONVERSION