Re: bug in substring???

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in substring???
Date: 2004-02-06 23:48:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0402061647220.7563-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Joe Conway wrote:

> scott.marlowe wrote:
> > gives me nothing. Shouldn't a negative offset, or even 0 offset result in
> > an error or something here? Or is there a special meaning to a negative
> > offset I'm not getting?
>
> In varlena.c there is this comment:
>
> * text_substr()
> * Return a substring starting at the specified position.
> * - thomas 1997-12-31
> *
> * Input:
> * - string
> * - starting position (is one-based)
> * - string length
> *
> * If the starting position is zero or less, then return from the start
> * of the string adjusting the length to be consistent with the
> * "negative start" per SQL92. If the length is less than zero, return
> * the remaining string.

thanks. I just got done looking up the SQL explanation, and I think my
head exploded. Thanks for the heads up.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-02-07 00:21:09 Re: Why has postmaster shutdown gotten so slow?
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-02-06 23:09:57 Re: bug in substring???