| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 23:41:35 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0311181640590.31994-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:39:40PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Supplanting PITR with Replication? If so, I don't think that's
>
> No, I think the idea is that if you're already using the replication
> system, you can get this for nothing along with it. Yes, it'll cost
> you in hardware.
No, it's more along the lines of "once the replication system is written,
it can be adapted to provide PITR (without the need for actual
replication) as a side effect.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rick Gigger | 2003-11-18 23:54:59 | Re: performance problem |
| Previous Message | Martin Marques | 2003-11-18 21:50:14 | Re: performance problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rick Gigger | 2003-11-18 23:54:59 | Re: performance problem |
| Previous Message | Dean Arnold | 2003-11-18 23:24:33 | Seeking concise PL/pgSQL syntax diagram |