Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4
Date: 2003-11-19 00:21:37
Message-ID: 3FBAB791.8020903@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

scott.marlowe wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:39:40PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>Supplanting PITR with Replication? If so, I don't think that's
>>
>>No, I think the idea is that if you're already using the replication
>>system, you can get this for nothing along with it. Yes, it'll cost
>>you in hardware.
>
>
> No, it's more along the lines of "once the replication system is written,
> it can be adapted to provide PITR (without the need for actual
> replication) as a side effect.

I think the opposit:

Once the PITR is written it can be used for Replication as side
effect.

For example the Sybase Replication is implemented in this way.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-19 00:55:14 Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4
Previous Message Rick Gigger 2003-11-18 23:54:59 Re: performance problem

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-19 00:55:14 Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4
Previous Message Rick Gigger 2003-11-18 23:54:59 Re: performance problem