From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |
Date: | 2003-11-19 00:21:37 |
Message-ID: | 3FBAB791.8020903@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:39:40PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>Supplanting PITR with Replication? If so, I don't think that's
>>
>>No, I think the idea is that if you're already using the replication
>>system, you can get this for nothing along with it. Yes, it'll cost
>>you in hardware.
>
>
> No, it's more along the lines of "once the replication system is written,
> it can be adapted to provide PITR (without the need for actual
> replication) as a side effect.
I think the opposit:
Once the PITR is written it can be used for Replication as side
effect.
For example the Sybase Replication is implemented in this way.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-19 00:55:14 | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |
Previous Message | Rick Gigger | 2003-11-18 23:54:59 | Re: performance problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-19 00:55:14 | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |
Previous Message | Rick Gigger | 2003-11-18 23:54:59 | Re: performance problem |