Re: Update of foreign key values

From: "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update of foreign key values
Date: 2003-08-12 14:26:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0308120720010.20635-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:

> Yes. Either DEFERRABLE or INITIALLY DEFERRED must be given in order for
> set constraints to be meaningful. This might be another good place to
> consider a little clarification (or maybe a doc note in the interactive
> docs)

Phew. I thought I was going bonkers. Then add that I never named the
constraints so I was still out'a luck.

Rod
--
"Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-12 14:30:38 Re: 7.4Beta1 "failed to create socket: Address family not
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-12 14:22:06 Re: Timestamp with zero precision