| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update of foreign key values |
| Date: | 2003-08-12 15:22:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3F390636.8020403@cvc.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yuup, always name constraints so it's easier to remove them. And if you name them meaningfully, then others might understand why they exist! (or later after a coffeeless morning)
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
>
>>Yes. Either DEFERRABLE or INITIALLY DEFERRED must be given in order for
>>set constraints to be meaningful. This might be another good place to
>>consider a little clarification (or maybe a doc note in the interactive
>>docs)
>
>
> Phew. I thought I was going bonkers. Then add that I never named the
> constraints so I was still out'a luck.
>
>
> Rod
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-08-12 15:25:39 | Re: Commercial support? |
| Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-08-12 15:19:49 | Re: PL/C functions |