| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial |
| Date: | 2003-08-04 16:42:41 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0308041041520.10507-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Joe Conway wrote:
> scott.marlowe wrote:
> >>10.Fix license
> >
> > Looking at the license for PHP found here:
> >
> > http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
> >
> > it would seem to be pretty much an apache style license that doesn't allow
> > you to relicense it without permission. but it looks BSD compatible.
>
> The issue was that plPHP as posted was claimed to be GPL, although there
> isn't any notice at all in the source that I saw.
>
> Does the PHP license require programs that dynamically link carry their
> license, similar to GPL (I didn't get that impression)? If not, then
> something like PL/PHP should be licensable under BSD.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's safe to link to. We could always as the PHP
guys themselves to be sure.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2003-08-04 16:59:48 | Re: like performance w/o wildcards. |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-04 16:39:27 | Re: [PERFORM] OSDL Database Test Suite 3 is available on PostgreSQL |