| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial |
| Date: | 2003-08-04 16:36:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3F2E8BA4.1050804@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
scott.marlowe wrote:
>>10.Fix license
>
> Looking at the license for PHP found here:
>
> http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
>
> it would seem to be pretty much an apache style license that doesn't allow
> you to relicense it without permission. but it looks BSD compatible.
>
>
The issue was that plPHP as posted was claimed to be GPL, although there
isn't any notice at all in the source that I saw.
Does the PHP license require programs that dynamically link carry their
license, similar to GPL (I didn't get that impression)? If not, then
something like PL/PHP should be licensable under BSD.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-04 16:39:27 | Re: [PERFORM] OSDL Database Test Suite 3 is available on PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-04 16:25:56 | Re: Functions and procedures code!!!! |