Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>
Cc: <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
Date: 2003-07-21 18:07:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0307211206310.16214-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Peter Galbavy wrote:

> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > If you aer running into problems w.r.t postgresql and looking at
> > migration, I suggest you post your specific problems on lists like
> > general. You might get some more mileage out of existing system.
>
> This isn't always possible. I know cases from personal experience where
> 'management' (who in many cases are defined as being clueless - see Dilbert)
> will say things like 'I went to lunch with the Oracle Business Development
> guy and we are going to migrate over in the next 3 months.'
>
> Staff on the front line need amunition to support sane alternative
> strategies, like not changing something if it works, but externally sourced
> analysis always reads better to most management.

I don't know, I've always found it quite effective to say, "Great, that
gives me three months to find another job." :-) I'm not bluffing when I
say it, thought, I mean it. If a boss is enough of an idiot to make those
decisions without consulting his developers I'd rather find another job.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roderick A. Anderson 2003-07-21 18:16:11 CD Label and inserts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-21 17:23:33 Re: Fundraising