Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle

From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>
To: <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
Date: 2003-07-21 09:49:21
Message-ID: 00a001c34f6d$5c70ed00$7c28a8c0@cblan.mblox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> If you aer running into problems w.r.t postgresql and looking at
> migration, I suggest you post your specific problems on lists like
> general. You might get some more mileage out of existing system.

This isn't always possible. I know cases from personal experience where
'management' (who in many cases are defined as being clueless - see Dilbert)
will say things like 'I went to lunch with the Oracle Business Development
guy and we are going to migrate over in the next 3 months.'

Staff on the front line need amunition to support sane alternative
strategies, like not changing something if it works, but externally sourced
analysis always reads better to most management.

Peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message am 2003-07-21 09:51:39 the Romanian version of the advocacy site is now updated
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-07-21 09:33:13 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle