| From: | "Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle |
| Date: | 2003-07-21 09:49:21 |
| Message-ID: | 00a001c34f6d$5c70ed00$7c28a8c0@cblan.mblox.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> If you aer running into problems w.r.t postgresql and looking at
> migration, I suggest you post your specific problems on lists like
> general. You might get some more mileage out of existing system.
This isn't always possible. I know cases from personal experience where
'management' (who in many cases are defined as being clueless - see Dilbert)
will say things like 'I went to lunch with the Oracle Business Development
guy and we are going to migrate over in the next 3 months.'
Staff on the front line need amunition to support sane alternative
strategies, like not changing something if it works, but externally sourced
analysis always reads better to most management.
Peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | am | 2003-07-21 09:51:39 | the Romanian version of the advocacy site is now updated |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-07-21 09:33:13 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle |