| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, Akash Shah <akash(dot)s(at)ap(dot)sony(dot)com>, "pgsql-jdbc (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Please help with binary file |
| Date: | 2003-07-02 13:53:00 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0307020950390.3542-100000@leary.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Kris Jurka wrote:
> >
> > In an attempt to clarify, are you really trying to say that the
> > performance of bytea is poor without the V3 protocol, so it is better to
> > use large objects unless security is a requirement because other database
> > users can potentially view your large objects?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
>
> >
> >>You would need a patch to use bytea with 7.3 but it is not an ideal
> >>solution so you should avoid it (it has not been incorporated to the
> >>sources so you would have to get into the business of building the
> >>driver yourself).
> >
> >
> > What patch is needed for bytea and 7.3?
> >
>
> I believe I've posted it (I can repost if necessary).
>
The only thing relevent I can see is
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2003-06/msg00027.php
which concerns a server bug which doesn't manifest itself if you have an
ascii or unicode database. I thought you were refering to a JDBC driver
patch.
Kris Jurka
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2003-07-03 14:19:35 | Re: Please help with binary file |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2003-07-02 13:48:19 | Re: db |