| From: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, Akash Shah <akash(dot)s(at)ap(dot)sony(dot)com>, "pgsql-jdbc (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Please help with binary file |
| Date: | 2003-07-02 13:39:17 |
| Message-ID: | 3F02E085.7070204@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> In an attempt to clarify, are you really trying to say that the
> performance of bytea is poor without the V3 protocol, so it is better to
> use large objects unless security is a requirement because other database
> users can potentially view your large objects?
>
Yes.
>
>>You would need a patch to use bytea with 7.3 but it is not an ideal
>>solution so you should avoid it (it has not been incorporated to the
>>sources so you would have to get into the business of building the
>>driver yourself).
>
>
> What patch is needed for bytea and 7.3?
>
I believe I've posted it (I can repost if necessary).
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2003-07-02 13:48:19 | Re: db |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2003-07-02 13:37:02 | Re: Please help with binary file |