Re: [SQL] arrays

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Mike Sosteric <mikes(at)athabascau(dot)ca>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] arrays
Date: 2002-10-04 16:08:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0210041008050.9386-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Mike Sosteric wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Apologies in advance if there is a more appropriate list.
>
> We are currently developing a database to host some complicated, XMl
> layered data. We have chosen postgres because of its ability to store
> multidimensional arrays. We feel that using these will allow us to
> simplify the database structure considerably by storing some data in
> multidimensional arrays.

the long and the short of it is that arrays are useful to store data, but
should not be used where you need to look up the data in them in a where
clause.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-10-04 16:13:12 Re: Inheritance: delete parent deletes children
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-10-04 16:07:57 Re: Deadlock

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-04 16:10:22 Re: numeric hierarchy again (was Re: floor function in 7.3b2)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-04 16:08:29 Re: Return of INSTEAD rules

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2002-10-04 16:30:47 Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-10-04 16:05:10 Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance