Re: numeric hierarchy again (was Re: floor function in 7.3b2)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Mario Weilguni <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: numeric hierarchy again (was Re: floor function in 7.3b2)
Date: 2002-10-04 16:10:22
Message-ID: 21500.1033747822@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Do we know that defaulting floating constants will not be a performance
> hit?

Uh ... what's your concern exactly? The datatype coercion (if any) will
happen once at parse time, not at runtime.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2002-10-04 16:14:04 Re: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-10-04 16:08:54 Re: [SQL] arrays