Re: DRDA, network protocol, and documentation

From: Brian Bruns <camber(at)ais(dot)org>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DRDA, network protocol, and documentation
Date: 2002-02-07 05:20:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0202070005340.11790-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I'd have to agree on that point. Although there is probably an interesting
subset of querys that work, but let's face it this is for canned
commercial packages, otherwise the code would be ported including the
network stuff.

For my purposes (DRDA) the present SQL dialect is just fine since the DRDA
standard is really orthogonal to the SQL 9x standards. So, hopefully if I
don't get bogged down with other stuff, the infrastructure will be there
to plug into when the time comes...although it'd be nice to be aware of
some of the nuances before hand to accomadate them.

Brian

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Gavin Sherry wrote:

> I intend on looking into ways to implement SQL*Net/TNS etc. It's not
> pretty but would be remarkably useful. I haven't started looking at it
> yet because PostgreSQL doesn't support all of the Oracle's SQL
> implementation. Until this happens there's really not much point.
>
> Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-02-07 05:27:27 Re: Suggestions for 7.3 date handling
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-02-07 05:15:15 Re: Suggestions for 7.3 date handling