On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 07:20, Brian Bruns wrote:
>
> For my purposes (DRDA) the present SQL dialect is just fine since the DRDA
> standard is really orthogonal to the SQL 9x standards. So, hopefully if I
> don't get bogged down with other stuff, the infrastructure will be there
> to plug into when the time comes...although it'd be nice to be aware of
> some of the nuances before hand to accomadate them.
What is the relation of DRDA to SQL/CLI (SQL Call Level Interface, part
3 of the standard) ?
------------
Hannu