From: | Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: fmgr_info ERROR |
Date: | 2001-10-30 23:30:56 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0110301530090.2624-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Yes, it seems there was a hiccup (on our part) of dropping the function and recreating it but not dropping and recreating the trigger. Thanks for the quick insight.
L.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com> writes:
> > We are receiving this error in the log file:
> > 2001-10-30 14:22:34 [17465] ERROR: fmgr_info: function 59668709: cache lookup failed
> > And just above it in the log file is:
> > 2001-10-30 14:22:26 [17355] NOTICE: InvalidateSharedInvalid: cache state reset
> > several times in a row.
>
> > Are they related? What could be causing this?
>
> Given that those are coming from different backends, I don't think
> they're related. The NOTICE can be ignored in any case.
>
> > How do I trace the number given (59668709) to the actual function or is this not relevant?
>
> select * from pg_proc where oid = 59668709 ... but I bet you'll find
> there's no matching entry. This seems to indicate that you've dropped
> a function entry that was still in use somewhere.
>
> What queries are drawing the error messages? (If you don't know, turn
> on query logging to find out.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Laurette Cisneros
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
Passenger Information Everywhere
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2001-10-31 00:05:09 | Re: backup file system |
Previous Message | Leong, Fushan | 2001-10-30 23:27:17 | backup file system |