From: | "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Leong, Fushan" <fushan(dot)leong(at)SonoSite(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: backup file system |
Date: | 2001-10-31 00:05:09 |
Message-ID: | 3BDEF9E5.3504.68FF164@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 30 Oct 2001 at 15:27, Leong, Fushan wrote:
> I am working on a shell script to backup my postgres database. Compared
> with pg_dump and pg_dumpall, I would like to backup the file system
> instead of dump the database because I can shutdown the database server
> in midnight for a few hours. I also can sure I will have a stable backup.
> ( No user is doing anything at the same time )
Personally, I'd rather use pg_dump. That way I'm guaranteed to have a
file which will work with a future version of PostgreSQL.
Why do you want to back up the file system instead of using pg_dump?
SIDE ISSUE: A possible benefit of using pg_dump instead of backing up the
file system: all parts of the database are excerised/explored; any bad parts of the file system will
be identified then.
--
Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Leong, Fushan | 2001-10-31 00:26:43 | file under data |
Previous Message | Laurette Cisneros | 2001-10-30 23:30:56 | Re: fmgr_info ERROR |