Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem

From: Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Date: 2001-10-04 17:46:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0110041045001.31235-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Hi Thomas,

Could I get some more specific information on how this is fixed. Keep in mind that using tochar() is not an option for us in that we ned to use COPY to/from the client.

Thanks,

L.

On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > Problem: the external representation of time and timestamp are
> > less precise than the internal representation.
>
> Fixed (as of yesterday) in the upcoming release.
>
> - Thomas
>

--
Laurette Cisneros
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
Passenger Information Everywhere

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-10-04 17:46:38 Re: timestamp resolution?
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-10-04 17:36:26 Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-10-04 18:00:22 Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-10-04 17:36:26 Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem