From: | Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
Date: | 2001-10-04 17:46:10 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0110041045001.31235-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Thomas,
Could I get some more specific information on how this is fixed. Keep in mind that using tochar() is not an option for us in that we ned to use COPY to/from the client.
Thanks,
L.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Problem: the external representation of time and timestamp are
> > less precise than the internal representation.
>
> Fixed (as of yesterday) in the upcoming release.
>
> - Thomas
>
--
Laurette Cisneros
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
Passenger Information Everywhere
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 17:46:38 | Re: timestamp resolution? |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-10-04 17:36:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 18:00:22 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-10-04 17:36:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |